Autores
Bent Flyvbjerg
Fecha de publicación
2006/4/1
Revista
Qualitative Inquiry. Paper listed as the "Most Read" and "Most Cited" article by the journal
Volumen
12
Número
2
Páginas
219-245
Editor
Sage Publications (free pdf: http://ssrn.com/abstract=223046)
Descripción
This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of …
Citas totales
200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202148175333468555842977122314571635189019332032195019381192