| As we may search—comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases P Jacso Current science 89 (9), 1537-1547, 2005 | 558 | 2005 |
| Google Scholar: the pros and the cons P Jacsó Online information review 29 (2), 208-214, 2005 | 460 | 2005 |
| Google scholar revisited P Jacsó Online information review 32 (1), 102-114, 2008 | 250 | 2008 |
| Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts P Jacso Online information review 30 (3), 297-309, 2006 | 198 | 2006 |
| Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar P Jacsó Online Information Review 34 (1), 175-191, 2010 | 140 | 2010 |
| The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar P Jacsó Online information review 32 (3), 437-452, 2008 | 136 | 2008 |
| Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for FW Lancaster P Jacsó Library trends 56 (4), 784-815, 2008 | 133 | 2008 |
| A deficiency in the algorithm for calculating the impact factor of scholarly journals: the journal impact factor P Jacsó Cortex 37 (4), 590-594, 2001 | 75 | 2001 |
| Content evaluation of databases P Jacso Annual review of information science and technology (ARIST) 32, 231-67, 1997 | 75 | 1997 |
| The plausibility of computing the h‐index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference‐enhanced databases IH Ting, P Jacsó Online Information Review, 2008 | 71 | 2008 |
| Calculating the h-index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators from Google Scholar with the Publish or Perish software P Jacsó Online information review 33 (6), 1189-1200, 2009 | 68 | 2009 |
| The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Scopus P Jacsó Online Information Review 32 (4), 524-535, 2008 | 67 | 2008 |
| Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports P Jacsó Online Information Review 33 (3), 603-614, 2009 | 62 | 2009 |
| Dubious hit counts and cuckoo's eggs P Jacsó Online Information Review 30 (2), 188-193, 2006 | 62 | 2006 |
| Google Scholar's Ghost Authors. P Jacso Library Journal 134 (18), 26-27, 2009 | 61 | 2009 |
| The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Web of Science P Jacso Online Information Review 32 (5), 673-688, 2008 | 59 | 2008 |
| Columns and News-Internet Insights-Thoughts About Federated Searching-Peter Jacso discusses the consolidated retrieval of results in response to a query sent to several databases. P Jacso Information Today 21 (9), 17-27, 2004 | 58 | 2004 |
| Quality of Abstracts. C Tenopir, P Jacso Online 17 (3), 1993 | 54 | 1993 |
| Comparison of journal impact rankings in the SCImago Journal & Country Rank and the Journal Citation Reports databases P Jacsó Online information review 34 (4), 642-657, 2010 | 53 | 2010 |
| The h-index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus P Jacsó Online Information Review 33 (4), 831-837, 2009 | 48 | 2009 |
Carol TenopirUniversity of Tennessee and University of HawaiiDirección de correo verificada de utk.edu
